This is the single most misunderstood area of overseas contractor coverage, and the one most likely to produce an uninsured claim.

The assumption that causes problems

Many contractors assume DBA obligations attach only to U.S. citizens working overseas. In practice, coverage obligations frequently extend to third-country nationals and locally hired staff working on covered contracts.

A company that insures its twelve American employees and treats its sixty local hires as outside the framework may have a very large uninsured exposure.

The three categories

U.S. nationals. Employees sent from the United States. Coverage obligations here are the least disputed.

Third-country nationals. Employees who are neither U.S. citizens nor citizens of the country where work is performed — a common staffing model in logistics, base support, and construction.

Local nationals. Citizens of the host country, hired locally. Often the largest headcount on a contract and the group most frequently overlooked.

Why it gets missed

  • Local hiring is sometimes handled by a local entity or staffing agent, blurring who the employer is
  • Payroll for local staff may sit outside the systems used to build the insurance submission
  • Headcount fluctuates with project phases, so a snapshot taken at binding understates the real exposure
  • Companies assume local labor law substitutes for the federal obligation

Practical steps

Build your submission from total headcount and total payroll across all categories, not just expatriate staff. Clarify in writing who the employer of record is for locally engaged workers. Track headcount changes through the contract and report them — adding fifty local workers in month four without notifying the carrier creates a problem in month five.

If your staffing runs through an agent or local subcontractor, verify what coverage they carry rather than assuming the question is answered somewhere.

The bottom line

Ask the question explicitly during placement rather than discovering the answer after an injury. The cost of covering local staff is generally far lower than the cost of a single uninsured serious claim.

All insights